开始设计

This commit is contained in:
2026-08-10 01:21:15 +08:00
commit e45398991f
228 changed files with 20827 additions and 0 deletions
+76
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,76 @@
#include "c_LinearProbingHashST.h"
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#define EXPECT_EQ(actual, expected, msg) \
do { \
if ((actual) != (expected)) { \
printf(" [X] Assert Failed: %s (Expected %d, got %d)\n", msg, (int)(expected), (int)(actual)); \
return C_FALSE; \
} \
} while(0)
// Struct payload representing active channel properties
typedef struct {
uint32_t src_address;
uint32_t dest_address;
uint16_t block_length;
} DMAControlBlock;
int compareUint16Keys(const void* a, const void* b) {
return (*(const uint16_t*)a - *(const uint16_t*)b);
}
c_bool_t test_linear_probing_hash_st(void) {
c_LinearProbingHashST_t lpst;
// Start with a small capacity = 4 to guarantee load threshold resize checks fire (triggers at N >= 2)
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Init(&lpst, 4, sizeof(uint16_t), sizeof(DMAControlBlock), NULL, compareUint16Keys), C_ERR_OK, "Init failed");
uint16_t ch0 = 12; DMAControlBlock d0 = { 0x20000000, 0x40000000, 512 };
uint16_t ch1 = 44; DMAControlBlock d1 = { 0x20001000, 0x40002000, 1024 };
uint16_t ch2 = 19; DMAControlBlock d2 = { 0x10000000, 0x30000000, 256 };
// 1. Core Data Entry Flows
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Put(&lpst, &ch0, &d0), C_ERR_OK, "Put ch0 failed");
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Put(&lpst, &ch1, &d1), C_ERR_OK, "Put ch1 failed (Resizing expansion milestone)");
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Put(&lpst, &ch2, &d2), C_ERR_OK, "Put ch2 failed");
EXPECT_EQ(lpst.N, 3, "Active count verification miscalculated");
// 2. Overwrite Mutation Check
DMAControlBlock d0_updated = { 0x20000000, 0x40000000, 2048 };
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Put(&lpst, &ch0, &d0_updated), C_ERR_OK, "Overwriting entry failed");
EXPECT_EQ(lpst.N, 3, "Size increased incorrectly during an overwrite operation");
// 3. Retrieval Lookups
uint16_t look_ch = 12;
DMAControlBlock* fetched = (DMAControlBlock*)c_LinearProbingHashST_Get(&lpst, &look_ch);
EXPECT_EQ(fetched != NULL && fetched->block_length == 2048, C_TRUE, "Lookup retrieved incorrect mapping segment values");
uint16_t miss_ch = 99;
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Get(&lpst, &miss_ch) == NULL, C_TRUE, "Key miss lookup did not return NULL");
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Contains(&lpst, &look_ch), C_TRUE, "Contains reporting failure on active keys");
// 4. Verification of Cluster-Repair Mechanics on Delete
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Delete(&lpst, &look_ch), C_ERR_OK, "Deletion operation crashed");
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Contains(&lpst, &look_ch), C_FALSE, "Deleted element still reported within lookups");
EXPECT_EQ(lpst.N, 2, "Size tracker did not reduce correctly after deletion");
// Assert that sibling entries pushed past index gaps remain accessible after cluster repair
uint16_t look_sibling = 19;
EXPECT_EQ(c_LinearProbingHashST_Contains(&lpst, &look_sibling), C_TRUE, "Linear probing gap repair broke adjacent cluster lookups");
c_LinearProbingHashST_Destroy(&lpst);
return C_TRUE;
}
int main(void) {
printf("=== Starting Framework Unit Testing: c_LinearProbingHashST ===\n");
if (test_linear_probing_hash_st()) {
printf(" [PASS] Linear Probing Hash ST Optimization and Cluster Repair Lifecycles Verified Successfully.\n");
} else {
printf(" [FAIL] Linear Probing Hash Table Component Encountered Evaluation Errors.\n");
}
return 0;
}